Archives For author

Chihuly 6Five years have gone by since my brain injury. Five years. I’m more than a little amazed it has been that long. I mean, I know it has been that long, and I know I’ve been talking about it for the entire time. This journal is proof of that, if nothing else. The earliest entries chronicle the first few weeks and months after my emergence from the coma. I’ve tended to return to thinking about that injury around its anniversary. I don’t think that’s terribly unusual. I take stock of where I am today and try and compare to how I was feeling five years ago. And then there are the flights of fancy where I imagine some alternate timeline in which the injury never took place. I try to draw comparisons and form conclusions across that divide. As you might imagine, it doesn’t work out very well. My time traveling skills are fairly restricted. Fortunately that restriction keeps me more-or-less safe from paradox.

Ani at Bejing Noodle No. 9For the past five years my friends and I have traveled to Las Vegas on the anniversary of my injury. We drink. We gamble. We eat too much. We stay up too late. Generally we leave our responsibilities at home and enjoy the moment. This year was no different in that respect. We did have a smaller group out of Chicago than in years past: T., Smokes, Stingo, Sabz, Bitsy, Whirl and I were joined by some special guests. Frank and Shane joined us from the City of Angels. Whirl’s cousin, Ani, was coincidentally in Las Vegas organizing a conference at the Mirage for her company. And Bitsy’s friend, Jeanine, who lives in Las Vegas, came down to the Strip to hang out with us for at least some of the time.

As for gambling, I scratched that itch with some healthy doses of pai gow poker, craps and limit hold ’em. The highlight of my gambling this trip was the five hour session at the Bellagio playing low stakes pai gow. The fact that at the end of the marathon I walked away from the table up nearly double what I wagered is just gravy. What made this such a fun experience were our two dealers, Reza and Jeff. Whirl, Smokes, T., Sabz and I commandeered a five seat pai gow bonus table. Normally pai gow poker seats six. This version we found at the Bellagio featured a community dragon hand played the house way, limiting the number of actual players to five maximum. Anyone playing could decide to bet on the communal dragon hand as well. This differs from how the dragon hand is offered and played normally. In a more typical version of pai gow the dragon hand is only offered when there is an empty seat at the table and the dragon hand is played with a rotating right of first refusal. The dealer offers the hand sequentially around the table. If you want to play it, you match your original bet and set the second hand any way you desire within the restrictions of the game. At our table, with a maximum of five players the dragon hand was always available. You just had to bet. And everyone that bet, was betting on the same hand against the house. It was a nice twist.

Veer Towers and TramI enjoy pai gow because it is such a social game. It plays slowly with a lot of pushes where neither the player nor the dealer win the hand. And players can help each other with strategy and advise on how to play. The actions of one player have no effect on the actions of other players. (This is true of many table games, but there are far too many perceptions and superstitions surrounding games like blackjack to act otherwise.) In pai gow you cannot “steal someone else’s ace”, for example. Whether this actually changes the probabilities or not is irrelevant. Perception and superstition are king and queen in gambling.

So. The five of us belly up to the table at the Bellagio and proceed to play and play and play. The afternoon starts slow, and we strike up a congenial conversation with our dealers. Over the course of the next five hours they would teach us strategies to pai gow, how to play banker and let us in on some of their collected stories in Las Vegas. Reza has been a dealer with MGM Mirage for twenty-two years. He’s dealt at the Golden Nugget, the Mirage and the Bellagio among others. Each time Steve Wynn would open a new casino, Reza would move to the new flagship. He amazed us with his ability to read seven card hands displayed for mere fractions of a second. MGM Mirage often deployed him to deal with high maintenance players. He would deal for 40 minute stretches and then take a 20 minute break. His relief was a phlegmatic dealer named Jeff. Jeff was the dealer who instructed Whirl and Smokes on the rewards and pitfalls of playing banker in pai gow and offered particular advice on just when to split pairs.

The two of them had plenty of stories of their experiences working as dealers at the Bellagio and elsewhere. They were always discreet, never compromising the identities of their customers or relating events that were particularly incriminating. Two of the most memorable stories concerned the particular characteristics of high rollers. One story detailed how the Bellagio appeased a particular baccarat player. The unnamed high roller could not suffer the clicking noise emitted when cards were pulled from the shoe. The Bellagio staff constructed a special shoe that did not click, and keeps it in storage just for this player. Another story was from some years ago at an unnamed casino when the largest chips on the floor were valued at $20000. A high roller was playing blackjack at $120000 a hand and had animatedly (and inadvertently) spilled the tray belonging to one of the cocktail waitresses. Drinks go everywhere. It’s a mess. The player brusquely asked the waitress what her mortgage was. She responded with the monthly payment value and was rejoined with: “No. That’s not what I asked. How much is your mortgage.” She thought for a moment and then told him it was $93000. The player immediately grabbed a stack of five of these $20000 chips and tips the waitress. This caused an uproar in the casino. The casino demanded that all markers be paid before tips were paid out. The casino refused to cash the waitress’ chips. The amount of money this player had dropped at the casino over the years was astronomical and eventually the casino saw reason and reached a passable resolution. The waitress ended up having to pay taxes on the tip, but she kept the money. The casino kept the player.

The recurring theme with these stories was that Las Vegas holds a magnifying glass to the the personalities that come there. People do not fundamentally change when they visit; instead the become that much more of who they are already. Kind people grow kinder; meanness becomes moreso. I appreciate this observation more and more as I think on it.

I coached Sabz and T. at craps, one of my other favorite games. Craps is the polar opposite of pai gow. Fast-paced, hectic action. Highly volatile, craps runs on streaks. I’m still not sure what that says about me that I count the slow-paced leisurely game of pai gow and the frenetic chaos of craps as two of my favorites.

Flamingo Flamingo FlamingoThe third game I played for any significant length of time was Texas Hold ’em poker. I played in one tournament, and spent the rest of my time playing cash games. This year I avoided no-limit hold ’em and opted for the limit tables as a change of pace. I did well. Not “big money” well, but well enough that I could pay for dinner and a show with my winnings. A couple of notable moments came while playing at the Flamingo. Smokes and Whirl were playing on the table next to me. Smokes has a singular laugh. For those of us who know him, it’s a beacon. We can always find him anywhere in the casino. It cuts through the noise of the slot machines, the cheers of the craps tables and the clatter of the roulette wheel. My poker table noticed it as well. I explained to them that it belonged to my friend and when Smokes came over to talk to me later, I introduced him to his fan club. Smokes has a way of making friends wherever he goes. That’s one of the things I love about him.

The other poker story reminded me that there’s always someone playing an angle, even among the low-rollers like me. I’d been playing limit hold ’em for a few hours, mostly unsuccessfully. My head was still above water, but I wasn’t making much headway and was starting to consider going and doing something else. Getting schooled on the improper use of the term “set” for what is accurately described as “trips” hadn’t helped my self-esteem and likely had gotten my thoughts of departure started. A woman sat down and flashed her platinum players club card to the dealer. He read her name and keyed her into the table. As the dealer handed the players club card back, he asked if she was Vietnamese. She said she was and asked the dealer how he knew. He stated her last name, pronouncing it correctly: Nguyen. The player feigned shock. Shock at two things: one, the dealer had pronounced her name correctly; and two, that he had drawn the conclusion that it was a Vietnamese name. At this point our dealer, Rock, pointed out that Scotty Nguyen is one of the best-known professional poker players currently active: a five-time WSOP bracelet winner, including the 1998 main event. Scott Nguyen is also from Vietnam. While Ms. Ngyuen sat there shuffling stacks of 8-10 chips simultaneously in each hand and claiming complete ignorance, I quietly packed up and headed for places east. Of course she’d never heard of Scotty Nguyen. That’s just absurd. — Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

Chicken and WafflesIn years past our group has consisted of a number of friends who enjoy buffets. We’ve been to several of the top buffets in Las Vegas. But after a while, I have to admit that all buffets start to blend together and none of them leave me particularly satisfied. This year the vocal buffet-goers were unable to join us, and we set out on a new direction with food. Whirl enjoys breakfast and did some research on some of the best breakfasts in Las Vegas. She found it. One of the most incredible breakfast experiences I’ve ever had was the chicken and waffles at Hash House a Go-Go at Imperial Palace. Sage fried chicken stacked with bacon waffles, hot maple caramel reduction and crowned with fried leeks. Truly a breakfast of champions.

The Crystals Grand StaircaseOne of my other fascinations with Las Vegas — besides food and gambling — is how it continues to reinvent itself architecturally. In December 2009, several key elements of the huge CityCenter development officially opened. We were able to visit the Aria casino and the Crystals entertainment and retail complex. I attempted to photograph some of this development from various perspectives. I’m uncertain of my success. The project is immense, the largest privately funded construction project in the United States, costing over $11B. While touring the spaces and dodging a Porsche 997 GT3 and a Ferarri F430, I happened into the Dale Chihuly Gallery at Aria. Whirl reminded me several times this trip about how much I appreciate Dale Chihuly’s art. He is one of my favorite artists. He had pieces at the Museum of Science and Industry a few years ago as part of “The Glass Experience”. The 1997 documentary Inspirations takes a in-depth look at his particular creative process.

Like our experience at the Bellagio, the gallery was empty. I had the place to myself, having arrived just a couple hours before closing. I made the faux pas of asking the curator of the gallery, “Do you mind if I shoot?” “Shoot?” he repeated back to me skeptically, throwing a glance to the glass sculpture that surrounded us. “Yeah. Shoot,” I start, then pause and turn crimson. “With my camera,” I attempt to explain hastily, punctuating with very nervous laughter. Earlier in the evening, I’d been asked to move along by security in The Crystals while trying to shoot the Grand Staircase. The gallery curator was much more congenial and finally let me off the hook with a well-intended caution to consider a less alarming verb when talking about photography around glass. I couldn’t help but remember Sean Connery’s line in Hunting for Red October: “Most things in here do not react well to bullets.”

I stayed in the Chihuly gallery until closing. I spoke at length with the curators about the pieces — all of which are also for sale, if you’re interested. We also talked about “Fiori di Como” the 2000-piece installation that forms the ceiling of the Bellagio lobby. I learned that the glass weighs over 40000 pounds, with an additional 10000 pounds of steel armature to support it. It continues to amaze me how Las Vegas can make this sort of fantastic artwork available to be experienced. The next day I had a similar experience as I spent a few minutes talking to Jennifer, the curator of the Richard MacDonald gallery at the Bellagio. MacDonald’s sculpture is inspired by the human form and the broad range of human emotion. MacDonald had been commissioned by Cirque du Soleil founder Guy Laliberté to create several pieces inspired by the circus. I did not have my camera with me at the time, however some of the exhibit is available online.

As a cap to the trip, Whirl and I took in the Cirque du Soleil show Mystère at Treasure Island. I have seen several shows over the past years and this one was quite impressive. We both had a great time taking in some breathtaking performances.

So now I head back to the real world, refreshed, relaxed and inspired. After five years of hard-fought reflection, I suspect that’s exactly as it should be.

(Carolyn Cole/Los Angeles Times)

A week ago today a magnitude 7.0 earthquake struck Haiti ten miles south of the nation’s capitol, Port-au-Prince. The earthquake brought devastation to the entire country. Today the European Union, quoting Haitian officials, estimated the death toll at 200,000. 1.5 million more people have been left homeless. Tragedy of this magnitude cannot be adequately expressed in words. It is the power of images — of seeing — that begins to finally convey what has transpired.

I’m not a photojournalist. I like to wonder what my life might be like if photography were my career. I have worked alongside photojournalists. I admire what it is they do. And while I gain a deep and satisfying sense of accomplishment from my own photography, I cannot help but have a bit of envy for the talent, skill, fortitude and grace with which these journalists make their trade.

The power of the photograph — the noble lie a photograph tells us the viewer — can come in its depiction of reality. It is a lie because a photograph is anything but reality. Nonetheless it is a noble lie in that the photograph attempts the impossible in spite of it being impossible. And for a moment, for a fraction of a second, we choose to believe it has succeeded.

As much as Aristotle would have us believe we are creatures of language, we are creatures of vision. And in the wake of tragedy such as what has struck Haiti, it is with our sense of vision that we turn to attempt to make some sense of what has happened.

I want to share a few collections of images from Haiti. But more than just refer to these galleries — incredible in their own right — I want to highlight a few comments from some of the professional photojournalists I respect as they have shared some of their own thoughts on Haiti and photojournalism.

Hi-res: Earthquake in Haiti: Images from Los Angeles Times photographers Carolyn Cole, Rick Loomis and Brian Vander Brug.

Haiti From Above: A gallery of aerial photographs of Haiti collected by Tim Reese, Assistant Directory of Multimedia for the Sacramento Bee.

Earthquake in Haiti: A gallery of wire service images of the Haiti earthquake presented by Alan Taylor for the Boston Globe.

Haiti, Alive: A gallery posted to the New York Times photography blog, “Lens”, collecting glimpses of life in Haiti during the 20th century. The images were drawn from the archives of the New York Times and of the National Geographic Society.

Reflections: Scott Strazzante, Chicago Tribune photojournalist, offers some quiet, respectful and considered candor on Haiti and the role of photojournalism on his blog, “Shooting from the Hip.”

Haiti: Chip Litherland, a ten-year photojournalism veteran based in Florida, adds some of his own thoughts about the tragedy and the power of the photograph. This observation particularly resonated with me:

The photos are what people are sharing. Twitter posts about journalists’ posts from the ground. Facebook postings with links to photo galleries. Photos. Not video. Not multimedia. Not a talking head in front of rubble waxing poetic about what a producer saw earlier in the day. Not showing up to the airport, setting up a live shot, saying you’re there covering the story and leaving. Photos. Photos that need no text. Just space to breathe and be seen.

Like Moths to a Flame: Matt Lutton and M. Scott Brauer present some thought-provoking opinions on the media’s role in covering tragedy on their blog “dvafoto”. The article begins by highlighting the psychological impact of the frenetic scrum around a recently rescued woman and continues to talk about the inherent contradictions involved in covering tragedy.

I have been recommending River of Gods by Ian McDonald since I finished reading it in November. Plenty of praise has been given to McDonald on the novel: “masterpiece”, “major achievement”. Nominated for the Hugo and Arthur C. Clarke Awards. The richness of the world McDonald created in that novel is something I have repeatedly compared to William Gibson‘s watershed novel, Neuromancer. Cyberabad Days is a return to the India of 2047. It is a smaller volume than the novel that spawned it. Weighing in at just short of 300 pages, it contains seven stories all set in the same world of River of Gods.

“The Little Goddess” is a 2006 Hugo nominee, best novella. “The Djinn’s Wife” is a 2007 Hugo Award winner, best novelette. Also included are the previously-published stories “Sanjeev and the Robotwallah”, “Kyle Meets the River”, “The Dust Assassin”, “An Eligible Boy”, and the new novella “Vishnu at the Cat Circus”.

Cyberabad Days is a triumphant return to the Inda of 2047, a new, muscular superpower of one and a half billion people in an age of artificial intelligences, climate change-induced drought, water wars, strange new genders, genetically improved children who age at half the rate of baseline humanity, and a population where males outnumber females four to one. India herself has fractured into a dozen states from Kerala to the headwaters of the Ganges in the Himalayas.

No, I’m not talking about the Bruce Springsteen album — although I do have that album and have enjoyed it a great deal. The Boss doesn’t do zombies. And this is a zombie novel. Steamboat Wille lent it to me so if there is some reason I end up disliking the book, I can conveniently blame him and escape any sense of culpability. As an aside, after about fifty pages in, I am enjoying it, so I think he’s off the hook. The Rising is the first novel by Brian Keene. It won Keene a Bram Stoker Award in 2003. It’s the story of a zombie uprising, but an uprising unlike the more familiar George Romero fashion.

I’ve learned that The Rising is actually the first in a two-part series of zombie novels by Keene. The second is the novel, City of the Dead. Keene is a new author for me. I’m intrigued by his take on the zombie legend. Keene’s zombies are intelligent. They are smart; they have a purpose. They want more than to shamble aimlessly around the shopping mall and consume.

From the back cover:

Nothing stays dead for long. The dead are returning to life, intelligent, determined … and very hungry. Escape seems impossible for Jim Thurmond, one of the few left alive in this nightmare world. But Jim’s young son is also alive and in grave danger hundreds of miles away. Despite astronomical odds, Jim vows to find him — or die trying.

Joined by an elderly preacher, a guilt-ridden scientist and an ex-prostitute, Jim sets out on a cross-country rescue mission. Together they must battle both the living and the living dead … and the even greater evel that awaits them at the end of their journey.

My friend L Cubed challenged me to put together a list of films for 2009. I took him up on the challenge. I don’t mean this to be my list of the best films of 2009. Rather it is a list of the films I quite enjoyed. I find myself talking about them and referring to them in subsequent conversation. They’re not necessarily even films that premiered in 2009. A number of these films were released last year, and one was released in 2004. These are films I saw this year. That’s my criteria for consideration: I saw the film in 2009, I enjoyed the film, I’ve talked about it with someone since viewing it.

The list is heavily skewed toward the fantastical: science fiction, fantasy, horror. While I enjoy those genres a great deal, I was somewhat surprised at the dominance in the list. Self-reflection may be good for something after all, I suppose. Perhaps this is telling me I enjoy the feeling of escape those genres can produce. But enough pop-psychoanalysis. Here is my list, presented in the order of viewing.

30 Days of Night : Netflix | IMDB | Rotten Tomatoes
The first of several vampire stories I enjoyed this year: a comic-book adaptation set in Barrow, Alaska. Thirty days without sunlight is an awfully long time for the undead to cause havoc.

Shine A Light : Netflix | IMDB | Rotten Tomatoes
Film icon shoots rock legends: Martin Scorsese captures the Rolling Stones at New York’s Beacon Theatre. Everything about this works: the music, the historical footage, the documentary work, the lights, the cameras, the egos.

Primer : Netflix | IMDB | Rotten Tomatoes
Completed on a $7000 budget over three years. Primer is a triumph. It combines a simplicity in effects, an acknowledgment of the audience as rational beings, and a fundamental device of science fiction: time travel. The result is brilliant.

Cloverfield : Netflix | IMDB | Rotten Tomatoes
J.J. Abrams’ skillful update of the classic Godzilla story is at once straightforward and shot at an angle. This is a study in taking a classic story and adapting it to be your own.

Teeth : Netflix | IMDB | Rotten Tomatoes
Smart, original and frighteningly funny. This is great black-comedy horror. Again, very low on special effects. The story drives the story.

Watchmen : Netflix | IMDB | Rotten Tomatoes
Zack Snyder completes what Terry Gilliam said was “unfilmable”. With last year’s The Dark Knight, Watchmen decisively settled the question as to whether comic-book movies can successfully transcended a cult sub-genre. Watchmen proves that films adapted from comic-books can be serious, successful, powerful works in their own right. Despite anything Alan Moore has to say about it.

Let the Right One In : Netflix | IMDB | Rotten Tomatoes
Swedish author John Ajvide Lindqvist adapted his novel by the same name to the screenplay for this breathtaking and intelligent interpretation of the vampire myth.

The Diving Bell and the Butterfly : Netflix | IMDB | Rotten Tomatoes
The beautiful film adaptation of the deeply personal book by the same name written by French journalist Jean-Dominique Bauby. Since my brain injury I have looked for voices and means of expression of what I went through and continue to carry with me. This is one such voice.

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince : Netflix | IMDB | Rotten Tomatoes
With the death of Dumbledore, this chapter is the tipping point of the Harry Potter story.

District 9 : Netflix | IMDB | Rotten Tomatoes
Science-fiction has long been used as a vehicle to talk about real issues. District 9 effectively combines story, character, setting, effects and narrative into something quite compelling.

In Bruges : Netflix | IMDB | Rotten Tomatoes
Carefully crafted and well executed, this black comedy follows two hitmen in hiding in the extremely photogenic town of Bruges, Belgium. This is another film where story and characters trump action and special effects. And I’ve always been a fan of Brendan Gleeson.

Avatar : Netflix | IMDB | Rotten Tomatoes
I know, I know. The plot is pedestrian. The villains are one-dimensional. — The film is brilliant. With Avatar, James Cameron marks a watershed moment in film production.

Read the rest of this entry »

In particularly distressful moments of frustration it is not uncommon for me to feel reduced to emotional arguments absent any useful data. And that just makes things worse. The rational engineer in me chafes. I know better. And then I feel guilty for not developing some strategy to provide a metric. If only I could quantify it. Quantifying the experience allows me to speak dispassionately to management. With a fistful of data, I can be calm, cool, collected. I move from being the boy who cried wolf to a more rational position. I am able to explain with an air of aloofness: critical infrastructure equipment is blowing up once a quarter, once a month, once a year. The actual numbers are less important than the fact that they’ve been collected and are reproducible. It becomes much more difficult to dismiss recommendations based on aging infrastructure when the rate of the infrastructure’s failure is clearly documented. I can think back to all those hours in the chemistry lab and still pull out the second law of thermodynamics. In an isolated system, entropy never decreases. Things fall apart.

So the end results are some acronyms that we’ve come to recognize and know and love:

  • MTBF : Mean Time Between Failures
  • MTTR : Mean Time To Recovery

How long is it going to be before something breaks. How long is it going to take to get back to normal after it does. Attach dollar amounts to those times — equipment costs, labor costs, cost of lost business. It simplifies things dramatically to assess the risk of particular designs, or other so-called cost-saving managerial decisions.

But things are more complex, now. Technology is still a mysterious, fetishized commodity. Personal taboos spring up and develop around how we contend with it. Many years ago I worked at a shop where all the engineers refused to make major changes on Tuesdays. Fridays I can understand. No one wants to kill the weekend if a big change goes wrong. But Tuesdays just seemed bizarrely arbitrary. The thing was, that for about a three month period, every change made on a Tuesday backfired in a catastrophic way. Tuesdays were cursed. If you did anything significant on the systems on a Tuesday, it would blow up. Maybe this was self-fulfilling. Maybe this was anxiety developed over time, but I can tell you that after being the rat metaphorically shocked one too many times in the Tuesday Skinner Box, I learned to avoid major work on Tuesdays. And I wasn’t alone. Eventually even management got on board and actively recommended against major Tuesday changes. Mondays and Wednesdays were fine. Thursdays were still good. Fridays we avoided if possible for more rational concerns. Tuesdays were forbidden: there be monsters here.

The Tuesday example is an extreme case. I’m including it more for humorous effect. It does underline one important aspect, though, that of conventional wisdom in the face of technology. Performance problems get attributed to particular fetishized causes across the board. It’s the firewall. It’s DNS. It’s Oracle. It’s swap. It’s spanning-tree. It’s the RAID controller. It’s a race condition. It doesn’t matter what the actual problem might be or how it’s manifesting, the first instinct is to blame the fetish.

If you happen to be responsible for the fetish in question, your first task is to clear the name of your particular ward before you can proceed. Because everyone knows that it’s always the “whatever the Hell it is that you’re responsible for.” And because this is conventional wisdom we’re talking about, it doesn’t matter how many times you clear your ward of wrongdoing. It’s always your stuff at fault. I don’t know where these conventions come from. Maybe they’re something akin to post-traumatic stress disorder. One bad experience scars you as a company for the rest of your technological life with that particular daemon.

The time spent clearing your system’s name is time wasted. It’s aggravating and depressing, too. I’m conscientious about my responsibilities. I want them to work. When they break, I step up and do what I can to correct them. It wounds me to suggest time and time again that my systems are at fault. I take that personally. My systems are at fault; I’m at fault.

In an increasingly complex technological world it is refreshing to be reminded “but we can measure that”. Enter a new metric promoted by Jim Metzler:

  • MTTI : Mean Time to Innocence

Metzler writes:

The conventional wisdom inside most companies, and even within most IT organizations, is that the cause of application degradation invariably is the network. This piece of conventional wisdom leads to a new management metric –- the mean time to innocence (MTTI). The MTTI is how long it takes for the networking organization to prove it is not the network causing the degradation. Once that task is accomplished, it is common to assume some other component of IT such as the servers must be at fault. This defensive (a.k.a., CYA) approach to troubleshooting elongates the time it takes to resolve application degradation issues.

It’s a great device. I think the MTTI metric — however cleverly titled — has the potential to refocus an entire IT organization off of perpetuation of useless fetishes and onto fixing real problems. It accomplishes this by promoting cooperation, and appropriate realignment of the entire operational structure. Metzler concludes:

[M]ore IT organizations need to focus their management attention on performance and these organizations also need to move away from a CYA approach to troubleshooting that is based on assigning blame and adopt an approach to troubleshooting that is based on fixing the problem.

Alternately, we could just stop changing things on Tuesdays.

I first came across the term “option paralysis” in the spring of 1992 while reading Douglas Coupland‘s first novel, Generation X. I thought it was brilliant insight at the time. The intervening eighteen years have only reconfirmed my opinion. Coupland included dozens of neologisms in the book’s page margins. Most of the remain thought-provoking and relevant to me today. And I continue to find humor in the irony embedded in many of them. Some of my favorites include:

  • Option Paralysis : The tendency, when given unlimited choices, to make none.
  • Musical Hairsplitting : The act of classifying music and musicians into pathologically picayune categories: “The Vienna Franks are a good example of urban white acid folk revivalism crossed with ska.”
  • Knee-Jerk Irony : The tendency to make flippant ironic comments as a reflexive matter of course in everyday conversation.
  • Obscurism : The practice of peppering daily life with obscure references (forgotten films, dead TV stars, unpopular books, defunct countries, etc.) as a means of showcasing one’s education and one’s wish to disassociate from the world of mass culture.
  • Status Substitution : Using an object with intellectual or fashionable cachet to substitute for an object that is merely pricey: “Brian, you left your copy of Camus in your brother’s BMW.”
  • Ultra Short Term Nostalgia : Homesickness for the extremely recent past: “God, things seemd so much better in the world last week.”

In 2005, Barry Schwartz gave a TED Talk titled “The Paradox of Choice.” While I doubt he is referred to Douglas Coupland directly, it appears to me as if Schwartz expanded the idea of option paralysis from Coupland’s nine curt words into a nineteen minute talk. Schwartz explored the sociological ramifications of the central tenet of western societies: freedom of choice. I found it fascinating. When scanning the reactions and comments I think Schwartz is unfairly criticized for the talk being entirely negative with regards to options. The fulcrum lies almost eight minutes into the talk after Schwartz has introduced the topic and is about to head into the meat of the criticism. He says:

So everywhere we look, big things and small things, material things and lifestyle things, life is a matter of choice. And the world we used to live in looked like this. That is to say, there were some choices, but not everything was a matter of choice. And the world we now live in looks like this. And the question is, is this good news, or bad news? And the answer is yes.

During this section he produces two slides: cartoons from the New Yorker. The first — the summary of world we used to live in — is a cartoon of Moses holding the tablets, addressing the multitude: “Well, actually, they are written in stone.” The second — the summary of the world we live in now — is cartoon of blank tablets, hammer and chisel by its side: “The Ten Commandments Do-It-Yourself Kit.” The cartoons both illustrate his point and provide some levity. Watch the talk yourself to get the full effect.

The counterpoint I want to make to those who criticize the talk as entirely negative with respect to choice. I want to emphasize the last two sentences of that transitional paragraph: is freedom of choice good or bad? The answer is yes. Schwartz’ premise is that freedom of choice is both a positive and a negative force in our lives. He starts into his critique with the statement, “We all know what’s good about it, so I’m going to talk about what’s bad about it.” There’s room to criticize him somewhat for the reluctance to underline the benefits, but he is on a pretty short leash in terms of time for the talk and I think his premise of freedom of choice as a basic beneficial tenet of modern industrialized Western society is correct. We don’t need to hear that part. We know it to be true. And that’s where Schwartz wants to challenge us.

Schwartz goes on for the next ten minutes giving succinct, compelling arguments about how choice has contributed to a form of social paralysis. He draws anecdotes from a number of sources: his experience buying a new pair of jeans, the adoption rate of employer matching monies in mutual fund, a psychology of value based on comparison.

The entire talk is filled with humor. Schwartz is an effective speaker. And like so many good TED talks, his speech transcends that platform of humorous rhetoric to provide voice to a critical big idea. As a society we may take freedom of choice as an unquestioned good. I think it is important to occasionally ask ourselves the question: is it? is it really?

Through the GardenIt is time to introduce another installment of the Gingerbread Project. For more than ten years, Spencer, Templar, Whirl and I have gotten together around the holidays to build some sort of creation out of gingerbread. Previous constructions include a model of the Field Museum, “Gummi Bear Castle Under Siege from Marshmallow Men”, the pod race from The Phantom Menace, “The House of the Atomic Duck”, “Velociraptors Escaping the Zoo”, and numerous other whimsies and mistakes. As you may have gleaned from the titles, our reverence for the Christmas holiday often takes a backseat to a more insidious form of gallows humor.

This year’s project is entitled “A House Under Construction”. Spencer and Templar have spent much of the calendar year suffering under a series of home improvement projects conducted on their new house in the Oak Park. Some of the projects were necessary for the sake of livability; some were more accurately classified as design changes based on personal desires. All of them involved a disruption to the daily routine, contractors, dust and the associated discontent that comes with living under construction.

We wanted to reflect some of that condition with our gingerbread house this year. Spencer took up the role of general architect. She designed a two story floor plan with one wall cut away to reveal interior scenes. The original design included two matching round turrets atop the structure. This element revised down to a single square turret after our attempts at baking a gingerbread tube suffered multiple catastrophic structural failures.

Comic Mischief 2Hill oversaw the inclusion of several elements of “comic mischief”. At one point he installed a gummi bear boxing ring in the second story, had other gummi bears stuck entering or exiting various windows of the house, and included at least one gummi bear plummeting to his demise upon a pile of bricks. As he generously explained to me, “it’s not funny if it does not include some element of pain.” Spencer and I rescued the falling worker with some Twizzler-rope and a team of gummi bears to belay.

Whirl took it upon herself to develop the small details. She outfitted the gingerbread house’s kitchen and bathroom. The kitchen included counters and tables based on IKEA designs. The bathroom included a functional toilet. Whirl was even kind enough to provide an indisposed gummi worker with reading material while he went about his business.

Danaan and Hill also worked on the house’s garden. The garden included reindeer, a Christmas tree, banana trees and a stone fence. Hill later added a team of gummi gardeners and a squad of gummi hunters attracted by the promise of an easy reindeer hunt in the garden. The gardeners hoped to provide sufficient deterrent with their rakes and shovels.

Through Danaan's EyesWe incorporated several elements to illustrate the state of being actively under construction. I used marshmallows to represent a brick facade, leaving one side of the house incomplete and piling the marshmallow bricks nearby for completion. Whirl created a stack of lumber out of thin gingerbread pieces. Teams of workers and foremen swarm the construction site, although several are occupied by the marauding alligator trying to get into the house through a first story window.

This year’s project is smaller than the Field Museum from last year, but it still took the six of us about four hours to complete. It measures a little more than eighteen inches wide by about 30 inches long by about 30 inches high at the top of the turret. And like all of the projects, it will remain at the Perry’s house and serve as decoration, snack and dessert for the next couple weeks. The candy usually goes first, and then the gingerbread. Sacrifices to the spirit of Christmas sugar.

Rainforest Butterfly 2Vacation this fall consisted of a trip to northern California. Many of Whirl‘s family members live in the area. We stayed in Oakland with Whirl‘s cousin, Ani. Nancy and Ray drove from southwestern Colorado to spend the week, staying with Nancy‘s sister Cynthia in Berkeley. Aside from getting together with family — something that does not happen as often as it once did for either Whirl or me — the trip’s other objective was the retrieval of Whirl’s possessions left behind when she moved to Chicago almost fifteen years ago. When Whirl moved to Chicago she packed up everything she could into a few big suitcases and we boarded a plane. Everything else ended up in a storage shed outside Santa Rosa. Where it waited, patiently, for us to return someday and move it with us. This was the mid-90s. Now it’s almost 2010, and we still haven’t retrieved it.

So, with the storage facility prices growing regularly, the service level declining by equal measure, and the value of the items in the shed potentially diminishing due to pest infestation, flooding, theft or any number of other variables we decided to finally clean out the storage shed, rid ourselves of a regular bill and finally bring those things of value back to Chicago. It is our home after all.

Ani and StephanieOpening the shed was something like opening a time capsule. Books, collectibles, clothes from the 80s — including a whole wardrobe of bridesmaid dresses Whirl wore for nearly a dozen weddings throughout the late 80s and early 90s. In short order, Nancy, Ray, Whirl, Cynthia and I separated items we wished to keep from those we could do without. The former we packed up and shipped to Chicago. The latter we threw in the back of Ani’s pickup truck and drove to the Santa Rosa Goodwill.

The trip included a lot of games, laughter and visits. Besides the trip to Santa Rosa, we headed across the rickety Bay Bridge into San Francisco for the day to visit the de Young Museum and the Academy of Sciences.

We took a couple cameras to document the opening of the storage shed, and I got some portraits of the family and our trip into San Francisco.

In the end we shipped sixteen fifty-pound boxes back to Chicago, almost entirely full of books — including some rare first editions — and thousands of comic books. The post office worker was bemusedly surprised when we showed up with the shipment. The packages will take up to two weeks to make it across the country, but after fifteen years, another two weeks isn’t really significant. Making our house more of a home is.

River of Gods, Ian McDonaldI came late to reading Ian McDonald. A couple years ago I read the second of his recent popular science fiction novels, Brasyl. I skipped the book that appears to have put him on the map, River of Gods. I am trying to remember why I did that, and what occurs to me is that I couldn’t find River of Gods in the bookstore and Brasyl had just been released. So maybe I picked it up as a book of opportunity. I remember being underwhelmed by Brasyl. And while I appreciated what McDonald was trying to do, I never felt fully satisfied by the execution of it. It didn’t compel me. It didn’t pull me in to a world like I had expected it to do. At some fundamental level, it just didn’t seem to work.

River of Gods is having the opposite effect. I’m a third of the way through this monstrous novel and I am having the hardest time putting it down. All my criticism about the lack of reader engagement in Brasyl is completely misplaced if I were to apply it to River of Gods. This is a wonderfully rich world. The characters are fascinating. The extrapolation on technology is engaging, insightful and frightening. I am repeatedly reminded of my first time through William Gibson‘s Neuromancer. While McDonald’s work is decidedly post-cyberpunk there is a striking similarity of breadth, depth, complexity and nuance. This 2004 Hugo Award nominee is a great science fiction novel.

As an aside, I was intrigued to learn that a former coworker of mine, Stephan Martiniere, did the cover illustration for the American trade paperback.

From the back cover:

As Mother India approaches her centenary, nine people are going about their business — a gangster, a cop, his wife, a politician, a stand-up comic, a set designer, a journalist, a scientist, and a dropout. And so is Aj — the waif, the mind reader, the prophet — when she one day finds a man who wants to stay hidden.

In the next few weeks, they will all be swept together to decide the fate of the nation.

River of Gods teems with the life of a country choked with peoples, cultures, and technologies — one and a half billion people, twelve semi-independent nations, nine million gods. Ian McDonald has written the great Indian novel of the new millennium, in which a war is fought, a love betrayed, and a message from a different world decoded, as the great river Ganges flows on.