Archives For author

Wild Ducks Flying Backward is Tom Robbins’ latest book. This anthology contains short stories and poems, reviews and essays written throughout Robbins’ career. Some of the material in this collection appeared previously in publications ranging from Esquire to Harper’s to Playboy to the New York Times. His introduction is a story in itself, describing the anticipation and culmination of opening your new Tom Robbins’ book for the first time. He describes the steps necessary to ensure privacy for this intimate encounter: finding the proper climate, the proper space and reminding us that “every halfway serious reader is perpetually subject to a form of coitus interruptus.” Those issues addressed, he continues to the heart of the matter:

Okay. At last you’re set. You prop up your feet (we should always read with our feet up, even on the subway or a bus) and retrieve the book, feeling in your hands the weight, the newness, the bookness of it. For a brief second you close your eyes, sip your libation, and allow yourself to wonder what Robbins is up to this time around. What strange lights on what distant mountainside have attracted his focus? Over whose campfire– gypsy? guerrilla? Girl Scout? shaman?– has he been toasting his ideas, his images, his figures of speech?

Curiosity suitably aroused, anticipation at a delicious pitch, you take a small breath and open the book and … Whoa! Wait a damn minute. Hold on. This isn’t the new Tom Robbins novel. Oh, it’s by Robbins alright, but … You look again at the cover. The Short Writings of … It’s printed right here on the jacket. Maybe it could have been in bigger type, but it isn’t as if you’ve been tricked. It’s your own fault and you should have paid closer attention. This will teach you to dash into a bookshop on your lunch hour. Wild Ducks Flying Backward is not a novel at all.

I have loved Tom Robbins’ work for over two decades when I first read Even Cowgirls Get the Blues. I fashioned my online nickname as a reverent reference to the mysterious man with a helmet of swarming bees in Robbins’ novel, Jitterbug Perfume. Robbins’ deteriorating eyesight reminds me just how great a treasure each new book, each new story must be.

La Galerie des Glaces 1I am a time traveler. No, I am not talking about literally going back in time as numerous authors have speculated. Unfortunately— or fortunately, depending on which author you read— literal time travel is still unavailable. Rather, I am talking about the powers of sentiment and memory, coupled with conversation and photographs and more permanent artifacts of times gone past, to transport me to a time and place I have been before.

On Sunday, Whirl had to go into the Museum to work. She had told me about an extensive photograph scanning system in the biology research wing. She and I had been recently experimenting with ways to quickly and easily convert some of our print photographs into digital photographs. Our first attempts consisted of simply taking pictures of the prints with our camera mounted on a tripod. That was not ideal, but it worked well enough to get some satisfaction out of the process. The biology photo scanning system is much better suited. Of particular interest to me, the system is able to scan black-and-white negatives.

HölderlinturmIn 1991 I lived in Germany. I spent the entire year there, landing in Berlin on January 1st. New Year’s Eve came to me that year on a Boeing 747 somewhere over the North Atlantic. I returned to the United States a day before Christmas Eve. I brought my camera with me: a 1965 Nikon Nikkormat FT Dad had given me. This was not the first camera I had ever used, but it was certainly the camera I learned the most about photography using.

In the mid-80s, Dad converted the smallest bathroom in our house into an amateur darkroom. He built a table over the bathtub out of an old closet door. He obtained second-hand enlargers, first black-and-white and eventually color, wherever he could find them inexpensively. He taught me how to shoot, develop film, and enlarge pictures. I went on to use what I had learned to shoot photographs and develop pictures for my High School newspaper and yearbook. And in college, I took the camera along with dozens of rolls of bulk-loaded black-and-white film with me to Europe.

Read the rest of this entry »

In 1940, Robert Heinlein wrote the story “The Roads Must Roll”. The rolling roads in the title were high-speed conveyors that connected cities. They carried people, freight and even restaurants and bars along for the ride. The express lanes of these roads had a top speed of 100 miles per hour. It is now sixty-seven years later and the best we can do to approach this idea are the moving walkways of Helmut Jahn‘s Concourse 1 out at O’Hare. That’s damned disappointing, right there. Don’t even get me started on the promises of flying cars, underwater resorts, moon colonies, and X-Ray glasses. And, hey! Where is my jetpack!?

Daniel H. Wilson has a Ph.D. in robotics from the Carnegie Mellon University Robotics Institute. And he has as many questions as I do about the future science-fiction authors have been promising us for the past fifty years. Not the least of which is the title of his latest book, Where’s My Jetpack? He also has some hilarious answers. He tells us what technologies do exist, who provides them, and where to find them. If the technology is not publicly available, he teaches you how to build, borrow or steal it. Now this is satire that doubles as real, practical education.

The Chicago Public Library picked The Crucible as the Fall 2007 selection for One Book, One Chicago. Writing The Crucible in 1952, Arthur Miller presents the Salem witch trials as a mirror by which to reflect the anti-communist hysteria embodied by Senator Joseph McCarthy. But more than that, the play—like so many Arthur Miller plays—revolves around the concepts of power and betrayal. In the introduction to my edition of the play, Christopher Bigsby writes:

What replaces the sense of natural community in The Crucible, […] and, on a different scale, 1950s America is a sense of participating in a ritual, of conformity to a ruling orthodoxy and hence a hostility to those who threaten it. The purity of one’s religious principles is confirmed by collaborating, at least by proxy, in the punishment of those who reject them. Racial identity is reinforced by eliminating those who might “contaminate” it, as one’s Americanness is underscored by identifying those who could be said to be un-American.

I have tried to read each season’s selection since the program was inaugurated in 2001. Some selections have been familiar, many unfamiliar. The Crucible belongs to the former category. I read it in high school twenty years ago. I am reading it again; now, with what I hope is a keener eye and a clearer understanding of its place in the social discourse: what art can bring to culture, tradition, politics and religion.

At the turn of the 20th Century, the sisters Ada and Minna Everleigh ran one of the most upscale brothels in Chicago: the Everleigh Club. The house, decorated with perfumed fountains, mirrored ceilings and a $15,000 gold-leafed piano in the Music Room, stood at 2131-2133 South Dearborn Street, not far from where Whirl and I now live. Custom House Row and the Levee District– as our neighborhoods were known at the time– were lousy with brothels and gambling halls, drifters, grifters and tramps.

Karen Abbott’s first book, Sin in the Second City, tells the story of “probably the most famous whorehouse in America’s history.” The comparisons to Erik Larson and Devil in the White City are unavoidable: Abbott writes in a similar, literary non-fiction style. She writes about a similar time and place. Many names are repeated in both works. I do not see these as criticisms.

The Chicago Tribune writes in its review:

At the heart of Abbott’s story beats the protracted war between the city’s purveyors of sin and its hawkers of salvation, between the city’s on-the-take pols, cops and brothelkeepers, and its social reformers, crusaders and Bible-thumpers.

So on this day when five colorful men have been convicted on all counts in the landmark Family Secrets mob-conspiracy trial, I return to the seedy Chicago of yesteryear to visit with my friends Michael “Hinky Dink” Kenna and “Bathhouse” John Coughlin. Hope to see you at the Club.

The short biography of Richard Bachman— written in 1984– states, “Bachman was a fairly unpleasant fellow who was born in New York and spent about ten years in the merchant marine after four years in the Coast Guard. He ultimately settled in rural central New Hampshire, where he wrote at night and tended to his medium-sized dairy farm during the day. [He and his wife, Claudia,] had one child, a boy, who died in an unfortunate accident at the age of six (he fell through a well cover and drowned). Three years ago a brain tumor was discovered near the base of Bachman’s brain; tricky surgery removed it.” Bachman died suddenly in February of 1985. He was killed by the Bangor Daily News when that paper published a story that Richard Bachman was actually Stephen King. King confirmed the story immediately.

The Bachman Books now refer to five novels written early in Stephen King’s career: Rage (1977), The Long Walk (1979), Road Work (1981), The Running Man (1982) and Thinner (1985). I read all of these but Thinner late last year. Blaze is now the sixth Richard Bachman novel in the classic sense: namely a novel originally written early in King’s career– before Carrie. The book jacket reads:

A fellow named Richard Bachman wrote Blaze in 1973 on an Olivetti typewriter then turned the machine over to Stephen King, who used it to write Carrie. Bachman died in 1985 (“cancer of the pseudonym”), but in late 2006 King found the original typescript of Blaze among his papers at the University of Maine’s Fogler Library (“How did this get here?!”), and decided that with it little revision it ought to be published.

Blaze is the story of Clayton Blaisdell, Jr.– of the crimes committed against him and the crimes he commits, including his last, the kidnapping of a baby heir worth millions. Blaze has been a slow thinker since childhood, when his father threw him down the stairs – and then threw him down again. After escaping an abusive institution for boys when he was a teenager, Blaze hooks up with George, a seasoned criminal who thinks he has all the answers. But then George is killed, and Blaze, though haunted by his partner is on his own.

With more than a nod to the John Steinbeck classic Of Mice and Men, Blaze promises to be a mix of classic storytelling by a young man who was convinced he was writing for the ages and edited by an older author who has succeeded in doing just that.

A little more than I year ago I finally read the Erik Larson blockbuster thriller, The Devil in the White City. I thoroughly enjoyed that book for a number of reasons: the book was factual, with hundreds of sources cited; it was set in nineteenth century America, a time and place with which I am repeatedly fascinated; it chronicled the 1893 Columbian Exposition that arguably brought Chicago back from the fire; and it illuminated– in great detail– the actions of one of America’s very first known serial killers.

Larson’s follow-up book, Thunderstruck, returns to this formula of marrying two seemingly incongruous true stories: the scientific work of Guglielmo Marconi, inventor of wireless communication and the “North London Cellar Murder,” a bizarre and detailed murder that captured popular imagination even fifteen years after the events themselves. Larson delves into the development of technology from wireless, to steamships to the emergence of forensic science to capture the events of a time and place not so far removed from our own as to be unrecognizable.

In 2005, TIME magazine chose On the Road by Jack Kerouac as one of the 100 best English-language novels from 1923 to then. This largely autobiographical work is based on the spontaneous road trips of Kerouac and his friends across mid-century America. Many consider this book the definitive work of the postwar Beat Generation– inspired by jazz, poetry, and drugs. I have never read it. I picked it up on my last trip to the bookstore, shortly before my trip to Pittsburgh. In college I read Blue Highways by William Least Heat-Moon while backpacking through Europe. Before that I read John Steinbeck’s Travels With Charley on a family road trip. I like to read travel journals while traveling. This time I just got distracted by something shiny– namely a certain wizard.

So I’m about a month late, but I’m looking forward to reading this seminal stream-of-consciousness look at an America that no longer exists– and maybe never did in the first place.

Chuck Klosterman has created a collection of previously published essays as Chuck Klosterman IV: A Decade of Curious People and Dangerous Ideas. The title is a tribute to Led Zeppelin’s untitled fourth album– commonly known as Led Zeppelin IV. He breaks the volume up into three sections: Things That Are True, Things That Might Be True, and Something That Isn’t True. Publishers Weekly describes his work, “Whether investigating Latino fans of British pop icon Morrissey, interviewing female tribute bands like Lez Zeppelin and AC/DShe or eating nothing but Chicken McNuggets for a week, Klosterman is always entertaining and often insightful.” My friend Smokes turned me on to Klosterman with Sex, Drugs and Cocoa Puffs. I liked most of that volume and I’ve been looking out for his name from time to time, now. I ran across a couple of his articles in Esquire magazine: “Tenacious TV” is an intriguing comparison of LOST to Survivor. “The Lester Bangs of Video Games” describes the cultural dearth of video game critics.

He’s not deep. His messages are superficial and unapologetic. When he’s on, he’s quite fun. And when he’s off, his Ritalin-paced pop culture criticism is mostly harmless.

I have been anticipating the availability of this film on DVD since I first learned of it last year. The Bridge is a documentary film about suicide. Inspired by Tad Friend’s article “Jumpers” published in the New Yorker, Eric Steel filmed the Golden Gate Bridge for a year. Steel captured footage of the suicides and interviewed their friends and family members. Steel also interviewed people who have attempted suicide at the bridge, and witnesses of the suicides.

It is not difficult to imagine this is a controversial subject. Accusations of deceit and exploitation have dogged Steel and the project. Steel revealed in an interview with the San Francisco Chronicle that his goal all along was to “allow us to see into the most impenetrable corners of the human mind and challenge us to think and talk about suicide in profoundly different ways.” What he told the Golden Gate Bridge officials in order to get permits was that his work was to be the first in a series of documentaries about national monuments. Perhaps it is because I found the project compelling and worthwhile that I defend Steel’s actions, and am willing to concede the stated premise as true. The Golden Gate Bridge is a national monument.

More suicides occur at the Golden Gate Bridge than anywhere else in the world. This film is a rare, unapologetic look into the mystery of suicide, and into the psyche of a person who feels drawn towards death.

Evocative, engrossing and haunting—Steel has produced a sensitive study of an iconic bridge, the souls who throw themselves from it and the ripples that final act leaves behind.