Mike Royko wrote a newspaper column in Chicago for thirty-four years. He started at the Daily News, then moved to the Sun-Times when the Daily News shut its doors. In 1984 he left the Sun-Times for the rival Chicago Tribune when the Sun-Times sold to Rupert Murdoch, claiming, “No self-respecting fish would be wrapped in a Murdoch paper.” His column was syndicated to some 600 papers around the country. He won fans, antagonists and awards– including the Pulitzer– for his work.

Royko died in 1997, just five short years after I arrived in Chicago. I remember reading his column when I first moved to town. I also recall never quite understanding his impact. I suspect that may be the deficiency of not growing up in this city. One More Time is a collection of just over 100 of Royko’s best columns. They were selected by his widow, Judy Royko, and several of Mike’s friends. Studs Terkel provided an introduction. Royko’s classic characters like Slats Grobnik live on in this collection; the Billy Goat Tavern is here as Mike remembered it. Some critics have argued Chicago pols get more attention than they perhaps deserve. Royko was an expert at finding universal truths in parochial situations. He could also keenly examine larger issues–war and peace, justice and injustice, wealth and poverty.

One reviewer describes the writer and his posthumous book this way:

A gruff, no-holds-barred writer, Royko spoke for the many who are voiceless. Despite his success and the rise of celebrity journalists, he remained refreshingly unimpressed with himself. “I just hope my next column is readable, doesn’t bore people,” he said in a 1993 interview. “I don’t have any grand scheme.” Yet the continued relevance of these columns reminds us that good journalists can make a difference. A terrific compendium for those who always meant to clip and save Royko’s words but didn’t.

That would be me.

Rick Kogan works as the host of WGN radio’s “Sunday Papers with Rick Kogan” and a senior writer and “Sidewalks” columnist at the Chicago Tribune. Years ago I counted myself a regular at the Billy Goat tavern on Washington– not the original, but filled with some shared history. But I know only the myths and misconceptions. In the acknowledgements of this book about Chicago’s Billy Goat Tavern Kogan writes:

You would not be holding this book in your hands if Sam and Bill Sianis had not asked me one afternoon sitting around a table at the tavern, “Would you write a book about the Billy Goat?” I told them that if they wanted a book strictly for the tourist crowd we could slap it together in about 30 minutes: a lot of pictures, a few Mike Royko columns, some curse and Saturday Night Live stories.

But Sam said, “No, I want the real story for the tourists and everybody else too,” and he then did everything in his considerable power to make it happen, correcting some long-standing errors in the historic record and offereing honest and often heartfelt answers to every question I asked him.

What Kogan produces is an affectionate tale that plunks you down at a barstool next to some of the Billy Goat’s regulars. In these stories he reminds us that the corner tavern is friendliest place in town and that there were once poets working for newspapers.

Last night’s game between the Chicago White Sox and the Texas Rangers was a treat. It showed teamwork. It showed skill. It showed drive and determination. It was a joy to watch. Last night’s game was also the first game in major league history to feature all of the following events. Each of these is something special in its own right, but to have all three happen in one game for the same team. Incredible:

  • a no-hitter (9.0 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 0 ER, 1 BB, 8 K) (Mark Buehrle)
  • a multi-home run game (2) (Jim Thome)
  • a grand slam (Jermaine Dye)

And just for good measure: That walk Buerhle issued was to Sammy Sosa. Buerhle picked Sosa off first base two pitches later. Oh, and Jerry Hairston Jr. gets tossed out the game for arguing with the umpires about being thrown out at first base on a bang-bang play. Buehrle has long been one of the majors’ fastest working pitchers. He completed this no-hitter in two hours and three minutes.

This is why I love baseball.

The Chicago Public Library picked Go Tell It on the Mountain, the first novel by James Baldwin, as the Spring 2007 selection for One Book, One Chicago. I have tried to read each season’s selection since the program was inaugurated in 2001. Some selections have been familiar, many unfamiliar. Go Tell It on the Mountain belongs to the latter category.

The back jacket cover of the book reads:

James Baldwin’s stunning first novel is now an American classic. With startling realism that brings Harlem and the black experience vividly to life, this is a work that touches the heart with emotion while it stimulates the mind with its narrative style, symbolism, and excoriating vision of racism in America.

Moving through time from the rural South to the northern ghetto, starkly contrasting the attitudes of two generations of an embattled family, Go Tell It on the Mountain is an unsurpassed portrayal of human beings caught up in a dramatic struggle and a society confronting inevitable change.

It struck me as an appropriate book to begin today. Today marks the 60th anniversary of the day Jackie Robinson put on a Brooklyn Dodgers uniform in a regular-season game for the first time, thus re-integrating Major League baseball forever.

One of Vladimir Nabokov‘s earlier works, Laughter in the Dark tells the story of a respectable, middle-aged man who abandons his wife for a lover half his age. This affection results in a mutually parasitic relationship. The themes Nabokov would revive in many of his later works, and most notably in Lolita. This novel interests me for several reasons. I have enjoyed everything I have ever read of Nabokov’s. This story is set in the film world of the 1930s Weimar Republic Berlin. And the book appeared as a minor plot device in LOST.

I think any one of those is reason enough to read it, don’t you?

Opening Day has come and gone this week. The Chicago White Sox have lost their first two games of the season. While I listened to game three against the Cleveland Indians, yesterday, it occurred to me that I had finished my last book and needed another. Bottom of the ninth, game tied 3-3. Mark Buerhle left the game in the top of the second after a line drive put a giant bruise on his left arm– his pitching arm.

Jermaine Dye singles; Rob Mackowiak pinch runs. Joe Crede singles, Mackowiak to second. Failed pickoff attempt to second base sends the ball to center field, Mackowiak to third, Crede to second. Tadahito Iguchi intentionally walks, bases loaded. A.J. Pierzynski batting: ball one. Then, Pierzynski is hit by the pitch, Mackowiak scores. Game over.

Pitching and moaning, indeed. This is not the way I like to see wins happen. Nevertheless, it is a win.

In 1998, Stephen King published The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon. This would be the last book he would publish before his injury. The story follows a nine year-old girl, Trisha McFarland, as she wanders off the Appalachian Trail and into the dark woods. I cannot say as I blame her. The constant infighting between her mother and her older brother would drive me off the trail, too. But these are Stephen King dark woods, full of peril and terror. For solace, Trisha tunes her Walkman to the Boston Red Sox game and follows the gritty performance of her hero, the closer, Tom Gordon.

In 2004, in the chronicle of the Red Sox season, Faithful, Stuart O’Nan poses King the question: now that Gordon is pitching for the Yankees does that girl still love him? It is a good question. King, so far, has left it unanswered.

Terry Prachett and Neil Gaiman have said, “Good Omens was written by two people who at the time were not at all well known except by the people who already knew them.” Considering the book was originally published in 1990, I must concede they are correct on that point. Neil Gaiman found considerable success with the Sandman series, Neverwhere and American Gods. Terry Prachett’s Discworld series garnered him millions of fans. But in the latter part of the eighties, these things were not yet true. The two aspiring authors collaborated to write this hilarious and irreverent send-up of the Apocalypse.

It was the blurb on the back of the book that caught my attention. Even more than the authors involved:

According to The Nice and Accurate Prophecies of Agnes Nutter, Witch (the world’s only completely accurate book of prophecies, written in 1655, before she exploded), the world will end on a Saturday. Next Saturday, in fact. Just before dinner. So the armies of Good and Evil are amassing, Atlantis is rising, frogs are falling, tempers are flaring. Everything appears to be going according to Divine Plan. Except a somewhat fussy angel and a fast-living demon—both of whom have lived amongst Earth’s mortals since The Beginning and have grown rather fond of the lifestyle—are not actually look forward to the coming Rapture. And someone seems to have misplaced the Anticrist…

Discover is a curious word. I have been fascinated with the word discover for some time. We like to think that it means to learn or invent something spontaneously– as if producing something new out of thin air. We say Galileo discovered the laws of motion. Sir Isaac Newton discovered gravity. Christopher Columbus discovered North America. But the truth is that those things were there all along. The forces of gravity worked upon Achilles, Hector and Agamemnon just as effectively as they do upon you and me, today. These things were not transmogrified at their moments of discovery. They were revealed to be true. The cover of ignorance– of unknowing– had been removed: discovered, uncovered.

Art is different. At the moment art is revealed it is handed over. Art is a sacrificial gift to be coveted, savored, squandered, mocked or copied. And there is nothing the artist can do about that choice once it has been given.

The relationship between artist and audience is a strained one. I believe an artist both loves and hates the audience. The artist requires an audience. Is an unread novel really a novel, regardless of how well-drafted it may be? Is a painting truly art if no one views it? Does an actor really act if the balcony is empty? I do not think so. I concede it may be possible to consider these events artistic absent any witnesses; but they strike me as something closer to lost treasures, valueless until the day they are actually discovered.

Now some artists have had fun with this bit of cosmic irony, postulating a world in which discovery functions much more like true prestidigitation. This brings a whole new meaning to something like the Copernican revolution. I appreciate that. I think it speaks to a motivation for some artists: a desire to change the world through expression.

Read the rest of this entry »

Spring is on its way. And spring means one important thing: baseball season. I have decided to set aside reading books I should have read in high school; I have had my fill of books about murder. I want something fun. I want baseball. Bill Veeck was a Chicago native and worked for many years in professional baseball in this town. Both sides of the town. He’s responsible for the ivy at Wrigley Field, the exploding scoreboard at Old Comiskey and Harry Carry’s “Take Me Out to the Ball Game” seventh-inning stretch.

Bill Veeck defines what it means to be a character. This autobiography, written in 1961 is an uncompromising look at professional baseball. According to the jacket, it promises to be, “… an uproarious book packed with baseball history and some of the most entertaining stories in all of sports literature.” Just in time for spring.

When I was at the bookstore last, I picked up To Kill a Mockingbird. I knew that Harper Lee and Truman Capote had been childhood friends. Lee has stated that she based the character, Dill Harris, on Capote. One of the great joys of bookstores lies in browsing them. A discovery on one shelf triggers a thought. I stalk to another section of the store looking for something– anything– inspired by that fleeting connection. To Kill a Mockingbird led to In Cold Blood. This non-fiction novel details the savage Clutter family murders in Holcomb, Kansas in 1959 and their aftermath.

Fascinated by a brief news item about the murders, Capote traveled with Lee to Holcomb and visited the scene of the massacre. The eccentric Capote spent six years writing this book– the story had that strong of an effect on him. The New York Review of Books wrote, “[In Cold Blood is] the best documentary account of an American crime ever written… The book chills the blood and exercises the intelligence … harrowing.” Whirl has encouraged me to read In Cold Blood for years. I think it is time I do.