Archives for category: Media

My first experience with Wax Trax Records happened in the mid-80s. I happened upon the store late. The founders had moved on to Chicago to start a record label by the same name. They maintained ownership of the original store in the seedy Capital Hill area of Denver, just south of Colfax Avenue behind the state capital. The store served as a pilgrimage site for me every time I would head up to Denver for any reason. If my friends and I were headed up to see a concert, we always allowed several hours to go to Wax Trax. It was part of the ritual. Today, when I talk to my friends about record stores—bemoaning their deaths with quiet, romantic sympathy—it is often Wax Trax that I am talking about. I can recall asking the clerks about the association between the Denver store and the Chicago label on my second or third visit. By that time the focus had shifted from the Denver punk scene to Chicago industrial. The store combined elements of both major musical movements in a way unique to the entire state of Colorado.

The Wax Trax store helped introduce me to a huge number of bands I would never have discovered otherwise: Front 242, Hüsker Dü, KMFDM, New Order, Sisters of Mercy, Joy Division, My Life With the Thrill Kill Kult, Depeche Mode, Nine Inch Nails, Sinead O’Connor, Ministry, Bauhaus and the Revolting Cocks.

So when I began talking to my friend and co-worker, Bruce, about our various hobbies a few months back, he began describing his interest in music. I talked about my reintroduction to photography. He would show me the various specialized tubes he had purchased for his music equipment. I would talk to him about lenses and darkrooms. Bruce is a quiet, introverted, highly skilled engineer. I respect him a great deal. He has a passion for elegant technical solutions to difficult problems and the experience and track record to back up his quiet confidence. He also moonlights as a sound engineer and plays guitar in his own band. Some time ago we began exchanging books as well. I have lent him On the Road by Jack Kerouac and Rock On by Dan Kennedy. He just lent me the recently-published Chris Connelly autobiography: Concrete, Bulletproof, Invisible and Fried: My Life as a Revolting Cock. I have just started reading it.

The book promises to open up the lives of the people who were in the middle of the music scene I only orbited second-hand in Denver. The back cover reads:

Connelly’s superbly written, funny, irreverent, and sometimes downright scary memoir is one of the finest portrayals of a man trapped in the eye of a post-punk industrial storm this side of Armageddon.

In it Connelly attempts to paints a fair, but disturbing picture of a drug-addicted, out-of-control tyrant in Al Jourgensen, the founder of Ministry. He describes both the personalities and places with wit, originality and humility. The book includes a litany of hallowed Chicago nightlife institutions from the 80s and 90s: places like Smart Bar, ChicagoTrax, and Cabaret Metro. Places I missed by four or five years as I moved to Chicago too late to experience most of these at their prime. My visits to those places came after Wax Trax Records filed for bankruptcy in 1992. Seattle grunge was on the rise, not Chicago industrial.

I wonder if there is a connection there to draw upon with my relationship to my child bride. Whirl arrived in Chicago out of the grunge scene of the Pacific Northwest where I came to Chicago through this musical path. I will have to think about that as I turn the pages and get back to you.

The wars in Iraq have figured as prominent cultural events in my adult life. I arrived in Berlin two weeks before the 1991 invasion and experienced firsthand the anti-American sentiment that decision fostered. When I returned to the States, I noticed how differently my experiences were from those of my friends and family. Germany’s perspective on war is different from that of many other nations, the US included. The last seven years have been characterized by various iterations of the terror war. I believe, in time, America’s involvement in Iraq will become the defining characteristic of my generation– more culturally significant than the Internet, the cellular phone, or Seattle grunge rock.

It is with this admission that I am surprised at how little I actually know about US involvement in Iraq. My condition is not due to lack of exposure. I know Iraq has not wanted for lack of copy or airplay. I know the wars in Iraq have dominated news, business and politics for at least the last eighteen years. Still I am left wondering: why? What is it we are doing there? So I intend to correct that oversight. Generation Kill is an award-winning book by the Rolling Stone journalist, Evan Wright. For two months in 2003 Wright experienced the most recent invasion of Iraq as an embedded reporter with the First Reconnaissance Battalion in the United States Marine Corps. The New York Times described Wright’s work.

Mr. Wright’s portrait is nuanced and grounded in details often overlooked in daily journalistic accounts, like the desperate search for places to relieve oneself during battle. Or the constant use of racial epithets toward fellow soldiers and Iraqis. … [This is a] complex portrait of able young men raised on video games and trained as killers. There’s 19-year-old Cpl. Harold James Trombley, whom Mr. Wright describes as curled over his machine gun, firing gleefully, and whom he quotes, as saying: ‘I was just thinking one thing when we drove into that ambush. “Grand Theft Auto: Vice City,”’ he says, referring to a video game. ‘I felt like I was living it.’

Like most things in life, I do not expect to find simple, elegant answers– as much as I might wish to do so. I am diving into this unknown with that apprehension and understanding firmly in mind. What I do hope to find is some bits of understanding– however small they might ultimately be.

I am away from home on business this week. I’m in Arlington, Texas, living out of a hotel. One of the perks of living out of a hotel– besides not having to make the bed or wash the dishes– is that the newspaper arrives right at my room every day before I get up. Granted, the newspaper I am receiving here at this hotel happens to be that stalwart of journalistic integrity, USA Today. And it is the lead story on today’s paper that has me once again asking the question: Why is this news?

USA Today’s lead story on the front page, above the fold complete with art, is: “Social, work lives collide on networking websites”. The story described how a woman updated her Facebook and MySpace pages shortly after she got married. She included pictures of her new wife. She received congratulations and blessings from her friends and family. And then a work acquaintance sent her a simple two-word note: “Nice pictures.” Her work life and her social life had collided.

Let’s walk through the basics of the story. She’s gay. People at her work do not know she is gay. She posts pictures of herself and her wife on the Internet. Unintended people find these pictures, view them, and then comment about having done so.

Again, why is this news?

I will set aside writing about the strong interdependencies between media and marketing for a moment: companies using the media to gain awareness with the public; media creating copy about otherwise flaccid goods and services in order to sell advertisements. I won’t go into that than to observe that social networking sites do not strike me as anything fundamentally different than the earliest college home pages I saw in the early ’90s other than to have a bit more automation and ease of use. Not that writing enough of the basic HTML to post “I ♥ Huckabees” is particularly difficult, but social networking sites have designed ways to make it even easier. That is MySpace’s contribution to the Internet, simple tools to make ugly web pages.

So we’re back to the fundamental issue of posting on the Internet. I liken Internet posts– of most any flavor– to walking into a very crowded room and broadcasting to anyone who will listen the intimate and mundane details of your life. Combine that with various methods of archiving data on the Internet, and those posts never completely die. They are always available in some form or another. Those stories were news maybe ten years ago. And for people who had been using the Internet since the 60s, I suspect they probably thought something similar in the 90s: this is old news. As a broader culture I think we started to realize sometime in the mid- to late-90s just how long a shelf-life data on the Internet actually has. Today, this is old news by any calculation. It is not relevant.

People are curious– some might say downright nosy. We want to know what is going on with people around us. From our innocent fascination with Boo Radley to the odious habits of Mrs. Grundy we all have a touch of voyeurism in us. The Internet expands our reach: we are no longer constrained to peeping in on our neighbors, but now can look at what is going on in most any neck of the woods. But the Internet does not fundamentally change the type of behavior, just the ease of access to it.

So the human behavior is certainly not new. Is it newsworthy for other reasons?

I am struggling to find a justification for the newsworthiness of this piece. I am failing. Yes, I understand that the boundaries between working life and personal life are blurring through technology. More people are working from home, or working on flexible schedules. More women are in the workplace than ever before. Mobile technologies like email, cellular phones, and laptop computers ease the ability to bring work with us wherever we go. This might be another example of that, I suppose. But it seems a pretty far reach to put a new spin on a story that has been developing for decades.

To paraphrase the voice in Field of Dreams, “If you post it, they will come.”

In response to the Megan Meier story that broke this past week I wanted to write something about what I think being online means. I also want to confess to more than a little curiosity about the process of how a given story becomes newsworthy. I want to know why various media outlets do or do not cover a given story, and in what manner. The coverage of this story from the St. Charles Journal and the Chicago Tribune are quite disparate.

I don’t think being on the Internet is an all-or-nothing sort of thing. Maybe that’s a perspective I’ve come to from working and playing on the Internet in various ways for the last few years. Like many of my friends, I am rather leery of the proliferation of social networking sites. The first one I joined was Six Degrees in the late 90s. I did not enjoy it, and cannot say that I have taken advantage of any more since then. I have had invitations for MySpace, LinkedIn, LiveJournal, Facebook, Classmates.com, Flickr, 43things, Last.fm and Twitter. I have declined all of these save Flickr. Maybe it is more a reflection of an introverted side of my personality, but I guess I see the Internet primarily as academic, a communication medium to exchange ideas, rather than primarily social, a communication medium to exchange phone numbers.

(I’m now worrying I’m sounding overly arrogant or bombastic, so I apologize if that’s the case. I don’t mean to.) Are some people predisposed to finding the predominant definition of themselves in the opinions of others? Is that the essential allure to social networking? Is it a predisposition to voyeurism? Is it a reaction to isolationism? As my friend, John, said the Internet provides for a much wider audience. Is the appeal there that with a broader audience I’m able to find more people like me than I normally would at my school, or in my hometown?

I’m not saying the Megan Meier story is not a sad one. It is. It is a sad story. I think what I’m saying is that this is not a necessarily new sad story. People can and will be cruel to other people. I think that the Internet gives people a longer reach to do just that. I guess I’m just struggling with answering the question: Why is this news? The cynic in me keeps crying that this is news because it is sexy. The Internet is shiny and mysterious, ambiguous and (seemingly) essential, pervasive and adaptable. — Sounds like the perfect monster to me. That condition has me thinking that the Megan Meier story is the new boogeyman horror story. (Parallel thought, it does not surprise me that one of the more recent Stephen King novels, Cell, is a zombie story about cellphones.)

I’d like to hope that this is news for some other reason. I’m just having trouble seeing what that might be.

Chuck Klosterman has created a collection of previously published essays as Chuck Klosterman IV: A Decade of Curious People and Dangerous Ideas. The title is a tribute to Led Zeppelin’s untitled fourth album– commonly known as Led Zeppelin IV. He breaks the volume up into three sections: Things That Are True, Things That Might Be True, and Something That Isn’t True. Publishers Weekly describes his work, “Whether investigating Latino fans of British pop icon Morrissey, interviewing female tribute bands like Lez Zeppelin and AC/DShe or eating nothing but Chicken McNuggets for a week, Klosterman is always entertaining and often insightful.” My friend Smokes turned me on to Klosterman with Sex, Drugs and Cocoa Puffs. I liked most of that volume and I’ve been looking out for his name from time to time, now. I ran across a couple of his articles in Esquire magazine: “Tenacious TV” is an intriguing comparison of LOST to Survivor. “The Lester Bangs of Video Games” describes the cultural dearth of video game critics.

He’s not deep. His messages are superficial and unapologetic. When he’s on, he’s quite fun. And when he’s off, his Ritalin-paced pop culture criticism is mostly harmless.

I have been anticipating the availability of this film on DVD since I first learned of it last year. The Bridge is a documentary film about suicide. Inspired by Tad Friend’s article “Jumpers” published in the New Yorker, Eric Steel filmed the Golden Gate Bridge for a year. Steel captured footage of the suicides and interviewed their friends and family members. Steel also interviewed people who have attempted suicide at the bridge, and witnesses of the suicides.

It is not difficult to imagine this is a controversial subject. Accusations of deceit and exploitation have dogged Steel and the project. Steel revealed in an interview with the San Francisco Chronicle that his goal all along was to “allow us to see into the most impenetrable corners of the human mind and challenge us to think and talk about suicide in profoundly different ways.” What he told the Golden Gate Bridge officials in order to get permits was that his work was to be the first in a series of documentaries about national monuments. Perhaps it is because I found the project compelling and worthwhile that I defend Steel’s actions, and am willing to concede the stated premise as true. The Golden Gate Bridge is a national monument.

More suicides occur at the Golden Gate Bridge than anywhere else in the world. This film is a rare, unapologetic look into the mystery of suicide, and into the psyche of a person who feels drawn towards death.

Evocative, engrossing and haunting—Steel has produced a sensitive study of an iconic bridge, the souls who throw themselves from it and the ripples that final act leaves behind.

I find talk of climate change seemingly everywhere I look. Yesterday more than a 150 of the world’s most popular music acts contributed to the worldwide concert, Live Earth. Twelve locations, seven continents, an audience of two billion. I have a difficult time wrapping my mind around something that large in scale. I wonder if that is not, in fact, part of the point.

Last month, on June 2nd, the Cool Globes project opened on the Chicago lakefront. One hundred and twenty-six five-foot globes have been set up as a public art display throughout Chicago, most of them along the lakefront in front of The Field Museum.

From the organizers:

“CoolGlobes: Hot Ideas for a Cooler Planet,” [is] an innovative project that uses the medium of public art to inspire individuals and organizations to take action against global warming. … [The globes are] displayed along Chicago’s lakefront from The Field Museum north and at Navy Pier. Artists from around the world, including Jim Dine, Yair Engel, Tom Van Sant and Juame Plensa, designed the globes, using a variety of materials to transform their plain white sphere to create awareness and provoke discussion about potential solutions to global warming.

Read the rest of this entry »

It’s spring of 2004. Ewan McGregor and Charley Boorman are trying to decide what to do with their summer. They come up with an incredible plan. Both are motorcycle enthusiasts and they want to do something unique. They decide to take the summer off and ride motorcycles around the world. They plan to start in London and end in New York City. And since they are planning something so singular, they decide to film it. Then they decide it would be better if someone filmed it for them. I imagine the initial conversation going something like this:

Charley, what do you want to do this summer?
Let’s ride our motorbikes around the world!
Brilliant!
Yes. Let’s ride through Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and Mongolia.
I’ve always wanted to see Mongolia!
And there’s this road here, look at the map. We can ride that.
The Road of Bones. Sounds bloody fantastic, it does!
One problem.
What’s that?
We haven’t got any motorbikes.
Right.

So McGregor and Boorman put together a crew, hire a Swiss cameraman, and get to work finding sponsors. What results is this incredible television documentary about their 115 day trip, Long Way Round. McGregor and Boorman use the journey as a vehicle to bring attention to UNICEF’s humanitarian work in Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Mongolia– including a powerful stop in an orphanage housing children affected by the Chernobyl disaster.

I am enjoying this series on a number of levels. It is a travel piece about a part of the world I know very little about. It shows a more unscripted side of celebrities. It underlines the distinction between tourism as a commercial enterprise and traveling as a journey. And McGregor and Boorman are witty and shrewd, authentic and charming.

I was pleased to learn that on 12. May, 2007 this crew began a second trip of a lifetime. They are traveling from from John o’ Groats at the northernmost tip of Scotland to Cape Town at the southernmost tip of Africa. They will ride through Central Europe and Eastern Africa. Again the pair are riding with a film crew and in support of UNICEF. This second trip of a lifetime is called Long Way Down. I invite to follow along through the BBC website associated with this trek.

I am tempted to start this entry with a quote from Agent J from Men In Black II. “Old and busted; new hotness.” I know that phrase fails to capture either the tone or the facts of the latest change in my life. Still, I like the humor in it. It makes me smile. In the simplest terms I have resigned from my position at Midway Games and accepted a new position at the Chicago Tribune.

Those of you who know me may have realized there had been changes in direction for me just based on the recent books I have been reading. I know those hints do little to address the inevitable question as to why I left Midway. I am afraid that is going to remain private. I will not upbraid Midway or the people that worked there with me. This will have to do: the most concise answer is that I was not happy. When I combined that fact with several failed attempts to decrease my dissatisfaction the outlook grew dim. So I left.

I have come to accept my own sentimentality. And I admit that the idea of working for a newspaper is something I have thought about doing for a long time. My very first job was for a newspaper: I was a paper boy for five years. Perhaps I have come full circle. I cannot say in good conscience that I anticipated working in this particular aspect of the newspaper—running the networks that glue it together. Still, I am working for the paper. And that feels good. At the end of the new employee orientation program, they invited us into the front page meeting. Where the editors for the various sections of the paper sat down and went over their various possibilities to run on the front page of the paper.

That experience galvanized me: I had made the right decision. This is a place I could enjoy working. I have only been here a couple days and I am quite optimistic that it will be many more.

Mike Royko wrote a newspaper column in Chicago for thirty-four years. He started at the Daily News, then moved to the Sun-Times when the Daily News shut its doors. In 1984 he left the Sun-Times for the rival Chicago Tribune when the Sun-Times sold to Rupert Murdoch, claiming, “No self-respecting fish would be wrapped in a Murdoch paper.” His column was syndicated to some 600 papers around the country. He won fans, antagonists and awards– including the Pulitzer– for his work.

Royko died in 1997, just five short years after I arrived in Chicago. I remember reading his column when I first moved to town. I also recall never quite understanding his impact. I suspect that may be the deficiency of not growing up in this city. One More Time is a collection of just over 100 of Royko’s best columns. They were selected by his widow, Judy Royko, and several of Mike’s friends. Studs Terkel provided an introduction. Royko’s classic characters like Slats Grobnik live on in this collection; the Billy Goat Tavern is here as Mike remembered it. Some critics have argued Chicago pols get more attention than they perhaps deserve. Royko was an expert at finding universal truths in parochial situations. He could also keenly examine larger issues–war and peace, justice and injustice, wealth and poverty.

One reviewer describes the writer and his posthumous book this way:

A gruff, no-holds-barred writer, Royko spoke for the many who are voiceless. Despite his success and the rise of celebrity journalists, he remained refreshingly unimpressed with himself. “I just hope my next column is readable, doesn’t bore people,” he said in a 1993 interview. “I don’t have any grand scheme.” Yet the continued relevance of these columns reminds us that good journalists can make a difference. A terrific compendium for those who always meant to clip and save Royko’s words but didn’t.

That would be me.